The car has too many tell-tale signs that it is not as represented (a 13k mile, original, unrestored car):
* a 1960 autronic eye unit on the dash - wrong for a 1959 car
* if the car is a Coupe deVille as stated in the ad it should have emblems on the quarter panels but it should not have the 62 series emblems on the fenders.
* seats have obviously been reupholstered - the vinyl is wrinkled, poorly fit throughout; Cadillac would not have let a car out the door looking like that
* the seat buttons on the lower part of the front seat are sewn in a crooked line - again not done by Cadillac
* rear seat center V section looks redone
* the horizontal panel on the back of the bench seat is too thick and not installed properly
* the welt in the door opening is too thick - not original
* stainless trim on passenger door was damaged when the door panel was reinstalled - see 2 dents?
* shift lever looks like it has black electrical tape wrapped around the painted end - different color than turn signal lever
* black paint is missing from rear grille - why if this is a 13k mile ORIGINAL car?
* of course, white walls are too wide
* cheap plastic Kmart-style door edge guard - if a 13k mile car should have original stainless door guards
The ebay seller is stating that this is a totally original car, the best of the best, a 13k mile original car, a piece of history. Not as I see it.
**** I would love to see photos of the engine compartment.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4529722729&indexURL=3#ebayphotohosting